Wikipedia appears to have become the “unofficial” internet resource for the USS Liberty apologists. Maintaining the lies and preventing discourse has supplanted the attack itself. Think about it, what would happen if the US government and the State of Israel via an honest and open ‘first time’ investigation were found to have deliberately “covered up” the attack for 42+ fricking years? This is their greatest fear. Control the message. Censor and cover up.
Wikipedia through deliberate subterfuge, collusion and Megaphone® notifications (research it) apparently joins the USS Liberty apologists and ignores the truth. So says a NYC principal.
Since its launch in 2001, Wikipedia has become the pre-eminent first port of call for anyone looking up anything – hundred of thousands of volunteers have worked, for free, to make sure that there’s an entry on subjects as diverse as quantum physics and Simon Cowell.
Now, however, it has been reported that Wikipedia has lost 49,000 volunteers in just the first three months of 2009.”
It’s becoming a propaganda mouthpiece of selected, controlled and approved information by a few. It’s killing itself through dishonesty like corporate newspapers. You know the ones that went along and puppeted the WMD’s that Saddam had but never did. People want the news and the truth not what a few determine to be the truth and the news and their nefarious agendas.
“I stopped contributing to Wikipedia when I discovered that all attempts to have a single additional entry added to the “U.S.S. Liberty Incident” were removed even when I sited as references such reputable sources as U.S. Treasury Officials, Admirals and Generals, Secretaries of State, the congressional record and other reputable individuals. The entry included the results of one particular investigation into Israels unprovoked attack on the U.S.S. Liberty. The Investigation concluded that Israel clearly intended to completely sink the ship, thereby murdering every Navy sailor on the ship known as the U.S.S Liberty.
No attempt to modify the entry was ever made. It was simply removed. (“Censored” is the proper word.) Those removing the entry would be persons who had never contributed or commented on that entry, had never edited the U.S.S. Liberty page, and provided the most preposterous, boarding on childish rationalizations for removing the entry.
It did not matter that I had been working with OTHER editors to resolve the wording of the entry. Every day, some new Editor would log in and delete the entry.
In other words, I worked on this entry for weeks, and some single editor would NOT EVEN ATTEMPT to compromise, but instead, remove the entry. This occurred with a new and different editor every day, sometimes twice a day, on the same entry, for weeks which spanned into 2 months. Many of these editors had NEVER worked on the U.S.S. Liberty article, yet logged in and removed this one entry. Clearly, collusion was involved. Collusion is illegal on WikiPedia, yet it did occur. Who Polices the Police? In Wikipedia, Israeli’s have the final word.
It was clear that criticism of Israel would not be allowed by any of the Zionist leaning editors, some of which would log in to this particular Wiki Entry and do only one action. Delete my entry.
“I had to inform my entire School, I am a principal in a NYC High School, that Wikipedia was no longer to be considered a valid source for any research for ANY papers submitted for grading.”
Wikipedia is clearly a website with a hidden agenda.“
P.S. A. Jay Cristol is cited as a legitimate source yet his deliberate fabrications and deceit is never mentioned.
The USS Liberty Memorial Website
One Response
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
Continuing the Discussion
You must be logged in to post a comment.